When a mentor evaluates a student in Finland there is a possibility that the student gets evaluated by his/hers character. Thats wrong becouse your character shouldn't have anything to do with nursing if you can be professional. Becouse we need nurses who are strong as whole person not nurses who good with practical skills but can't talk to patients.The diagram i made has no theoretic base its just how i feel. So if the student is allways evaluated based on his/hers character she might not understand that there is a problem with her, becouse nobody hasn't given her any really usefull feedback.
Malta and England have really strict bases in evaluating students but Finland doesn't. So i think we Finnish should take something from the English ja Maltese. The universities should promise that nurses who come from their university have at least basic skills. There should be a norm for all the student that after they graduate from the university they know certain things
Really like the diagram Antti and it raises some interesting questions, it would be good to see on what criteria mentors in the different countries are chosen and what training they are given to help them mentor students, is practical experience enough or do they need other skills, like knowledge of the learning theories. It would also be interesting to see examples of the criteria used in each country to evaluate students.
VastaaPoista